Image

Cast Aluminum Preforms

Dec. 15, 2008
Q: I am looking for information, both technical and statistical, on the status of cast aluminum preforms for forgings. I found scattered references online, but not much real information. What is the status of this technology?

Raleigh Bicycles developed the Aluforge process for producing castings to be forged into crank arms with minimal flash.
A:  There are at least two basic processes for casting preforms for forging. Raleigh Bicycles in England developed the Aluforge Process as a near-scrapless process for forging bicycle crank arms of either simple or complex design from 6061 alloy. I visited that plant twice. Their method involved permanent mold casting of preforms in a platter that was cooled in a copper beryllium mold to below 700°F, followed by “wash heating” to 850°F, and then forged in a hydraulic press to form the crank arms. After trimming, the flash was cleaned and returned to a pot for remelting. In this way, the process was nearly flashless. The finished forgings were heat treated and then finished by drilling, tapping, and polishing.

A similar process was developed by a Japanese firm for forging scrolls for compressors for off-highway equipment, and for some automotive applications. They forged from both cast preforms and cast round billet. The high-silicon, wear-resistant alloys that were used are tough on forging dies that have not been ion-nitrided.

The other process that I am aware of is one that is being developed by Wagstaff Corp., which pioneered continuous casting of bar and billet for aluminum alloys. The company has been developing the process of casting profiles for re-forging into complex shapes to save in flash metal losses.

For more than 40 years H. James Henning held key technical positions in the forging industry, including as director of technology for the Forging Industry Association, and as president of Henning Education Services, a Columbus, OH, firm specializing in customized education and training in forging technologies.

Guidelines and recommendations offered in this column are based on information believed to be reliable and are supplied in good faith but without guarantee. Operational conditions that exist in individual plants and facilities vary widely. Users of this information should adapt it, and always exercise independent discretion in establishing plant or facility operating practice.

About the Author

H. James Henning

In all, Jim spent 44 years as a technician, engineer, and supervisor in the forging industry prior to his retirement, including nine years as technical director of the Forging Industry Assn.

Upon his retirement from FIA in 1996, Jim formed Henning Educational Services Inc. There, he filled a problem-solving role for forgers and other manufacturers seeking solutions to process and organizational issues. He shared his expertise on hot, cold, and warm forging, on tool design principles, process and equipment selection, and productivity and quality improvements.