Each of these alloys can be heattreated to the same strength level in the section sizes used for automotive con rods

Comparing 4140, 4340, and 5140 Alloys

Feb. 27, 2009
Comparing the use and effectiveness of steel alloys.

Q: Please explain which of these forging materials is strongest for producing connecting rods and crankshafts. A: All of these alloys can be heat-treated to the same strength level in the section sizes used for automotive con rods.

For crankshafts, on the other hand, the heat-treat response is restricted somewhat, depending on the size of the crank being produced. For automotive size cranks with section sizes in the 2.5 to 3 in. category, all these alloys can be heat-treated to typical strength levels. However, for very high strengths the 4340 grade is heat treatable with the least distortion because it does not need to be quenched in water or in cold oil. The grade is more expensive than the other two.

A large percentage of automotive and small tractor cranks are being forged from micro-alloyed steels. The current practice for automotive cranks is to forge and rapidly air cool followed by a stress relief. Journals are induction-hardened.

For more than 40 years H. James Henning held key technical positions in the forging industry, including as director of technology for the Forging Industry Association, and as president of Henning Education Services, a Columbus, OH, firm specializing in customized education and training in forging technologies.

Guidelines and recommendations offered in this column are based on information believed to be reliable and are supplied in good faith but without guarantee. Operational conditions that exist in individual plants and facilities vary widely. Users of this information should adapt it, and always exercise independent discretion in establishing plant or facility operating practice.

About the Author

H. James Henning

In all, Jim spent 44 years as a technician, engineer, and supervisor in the forging industry prior to his retirement, including nine years as technical director of the Forging Industry Assn.

Upon his retirement from FIA in 1996, Jim formed Henning Educational Services Inc. There, he filled a problem-solving role for forgers and other manufacturers seeking solutions to process and organizational issues. He shared his expertise on hot, cold, and warm forging, on tool design principles, process and equipment selection, and productivity and quality improvements.