Latest from Quality Control

Forging Buyers 2122 Promo
Home

New Article

April 26, 2022
Exact Metrology
Np Artec3 D Scanner
Pongchart Buranaprasertsuk | Dreamstime
Dreamstime 197374349
AMETEK Land
Spot Al Eqs Range 800
InfraTec GmbH
Np Infratec Imageir 8300 800
Dovzhykov | Dreamstime
Dreamstime154075769 800
Columbia Marking Tools
Np Forg Cmt Mite E Mark 800
Superior Forge amp Steel melts specialty alloy steels in an electric arc furnace and casts ingots for forging into mill rolls

EPA, Superior Forge & Steel Reach Settlement

Feb. 4, 2014
$61,673 penalty Incidents at two sites, 2010-2011 EPCRA requirements

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently reported that it reached an agreement with Superior Forge & Steel Corporation over alleged violations of toxic chemical reporting requirements at its plants in New Castle and Pittsburgh, PA. Without admitting any liability, Superior Forge & Steel will pay a $61,673 penalty to settle the allegations.

Superior Forge & Steel is an integrated producer of rolling mill work rolls and backup rolls, with an electric melt shop at New Castle, PA, and a 4,000-ton hydraulic forging press. The press has dual fixed rail manipulator capability, able to forge 60 and 30 metric ton products.

EPA alleged the reporting violations occurred at the New Castle plant in 2010 and 2011, and at a machining operation in Pittsburgh in 2011.

EPA cited Superior Forge for violating the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), a federal law intend to inform the public and emergency responders about the presence of hazardous and toxic chemicals. EPCRA requires businesses to submit annual reports on regulated chemicals, and routine and accidental chemical releases.

In addition, EPCRA requires businesses to report the presence of hazardous chemicals to state and local emergency-response authorities.

EPA alleged Superior Forge did not submit timely annual reports for chromium and lead when the company processed those toxic chemicals in amounts exceeding EPCRA reportable quantities (25,000 lbs. for chromium, 100 lb. for lead).

EPA conducted the inspections after a review of Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data indicated that there was a gap in the data submitted by the company.

The agency stated that the settlement penalty reflects the Superior Forge & Steel’s cooperation with EPA to resolve the matter and comply with applicable EPCRA requirements.

About the Author

Robert Brooks | Editor/Content Director - Endeavor Business Media

Robert Brooks has been a business-to-business reporter, writer, editor, and columnist for more than 20 years, specializing in the primary metal and basic manufacturing industries. His work has covered a wide range of topics including process technology, resource development, material selection, product design, workforce development, and industrial market strategies, among others.

Currently, he specializes in subjects related to metal component and product design, development, and manufacturing—including castings, forgings, machined parts, and fabrications.

Brooks is a graduate of Kenyon College (B.A. English, Political Science) and Emory University (M.A. English.)